4 ms·
> There's no moral obligation to try to extend life as long as technologically possible. For me there is, if there is something to save (i.e. not brain dead).
by kitkat_new 4y ago
> There's no moral obligation to try to extend life as long as technologically possible.
For me there is, if there is something to save (i.e. not brain dead).
- smeej 4y agoEven if someone isn't yet brain dead, if there's no hope of recovery and it's just going to be a long slog of supporting more and more organs artificially until either the brain gives up or we hit an organ we can't save, I have no problem with allowing death to come because we stop supporting at least one organ, without which the person cannot survive.