4 ms·Not quite. Just that the ruler is the law.by 0xmohit 4y agoNot quite. Just that the ruler is the law.ethbr0 4y agoThat's contrary to the definition of the term. If the ruler is the law, then there is no rule of law.0xmohit 4y ago> If the ruler is the law, then there is no rule of law. I thought that it was obvious :)