15 ms·
That's 100% fair, but I don't think that's really the argument of GP. The argument is that the interface is inadequate, not that the result itself is. With eno
by ratww 4y ago
That's 100% fair, but I don't think that's really the argument of GP. The argument is that the interface is inadequate, not that the result itself is.
With enough force you can definitely fit a square object in a round hole. Not saying I totally agree. IMO it heavily depends. I've seen my share of native monstrosities (seen lots of XAML/WPF apps with zero accessibility and very slow, although WPF is lovely from a dev perspective), and "productivity" covers a lot of ground.