The measured side of me always wants to err on the side of inaction. The one about life savings is a difficult one and I think at a distance without the peer p

The measured side of me always wants to err on the side of inaction. The one about life savings is a difficult one and I think at a distance without the peer pressure or emotional bias of a high pressure situation I would certainly choose to save the life savings. More interesting I think would be a question involving family members. How many people do you kill (by pulling the lever) to save a parent, or your child?