4 ms·
These “pimps” serve as surrogates for the cammer, (consensually) impersonating them so that the cammer’s account can engage with more subscribers. I wonder how
by MontyCarloHall 4y ago
These “pimps” serve as surrogates for the cammer, (consensually) impersonating them so that the cammer’s account can engage with more subscribers.
I wonder how convincing something like GPT-3 would be at this. I give it 5 years tops for 100% AI OnlyFans accounts to be commonplace, complete with artificial personalized livestreams.
- iratewizard 4y agoWhen we get to that point, people will form pair bonds with holograms that text and video chat them on the go.
- ivraatiems 4y agoThat's already happening: https://www.reddit.com/r/replika/ https://www.reddit.com/r/replika/
- Phlarp 4y agoI guess I'm stocked up on cringe for the whole week now
- belval 4y agoThis is actually very interesting, so a company is offering a "teach your own AI" thing so that you can build a "relationship" with it? That's some blade runner/cyberpunk/black mirror stuff if I have ever seen some.
- bohadi 4y ago.The first turing ai's will wage war and sell sex
- thorum 4y agoThe problem with GPT-3 is it’s too agreeable. It will agree to anything and promise anything - which is not a good idea in this context, to put it mildly.
- sixQuarks 4y agoPoster said 5 years, not now
- cookingrobot 4y agoIt’s possible to prime it to take different personas. If you start with a setup like “a conservation with a disagreeable chatbot” and give an example of some unfriendly back and forth it can pick it up and be unfriendly. The recent case of the “sentient bot” at Google was apparently primed to be agreeable.
- deleted 4y ago[deleted]
- travbrack 4y agoIf you made GPT-3 respond to onlyfans DMs you would have some hilarious results.