3 ms·

I think some creators pursue products as ways to fund their passions. For example, was deno deploy always the endgame or is it just a way to fund working on den

I think some creators pursue products as ways to fund their passions. For example, was deno deploy always the endgame or is it just a way to fund working on deno? Aside from motivation, how it's implemented and how it affects the community matters.

asciiresort 4y ago
> it has the edge in mind This part, very early on in the Bun page, stood out. That’s a monetizable product, even if the code is open source. That to me felt like positioning itself as a potential drop in replacement for Deno Deploy / Edge Functions. There was serverless, and now the next trend is with edge computing. It’s already happening, but now specifically about runtimes on that edge.
- andyfleming 4y ago
  It actually seems more vendor agnostic in description. It's an overall advantage of bun, but there isn't any first-class bun service pitched (at least at this point).
- ignoramous 4y ago
  > This part, very early on in the Bun page, stood out. That’s a monetizable product, even if the code is open source. bun isn't open source, it is source available (at this point in time, at least): https://github.com/Jarred-Sumner/bun/issues/241 https://github.com/Jarred-Sumner/bun/issues/241