3 ms·
Respectfully suggest that this analysis is more whistling in the dark. The very idea that human leadership has things under control overlooks multiple events i
by 8bitsrule 4y ago
Respectfully suggest that this analysis is more whistling in the dark.
The very idea that human leadership has things under control overlooks multiple events in history - e.g. the Bronze Age Collapse we're still trying to explain - and suggests both amnesia and completely undue hubris. The idea also overlooks the potential for other kinds of simultaneous disaster being heaped on. (CME's for one.) We can anticipate them, but they are beyond our control - and may disable further options.
There was a mass extinction of hundreds of species of megafauna just before our known history begins. Can't agree on the cause - but nonetheless the Moving Hand moved on.
In the past two years, the fear and death created by one little invisible bug, which we declined to prepare for, has badly damaged economic stability. If we continue to overplay our weak hand, who will pay for the damage - and with what?
- deleted 4y ago[deleted]
- ncmncm 4y agoThe mass extinction has been definitively traced to coincidence with the comet strike of 10818 BCE. Actual proof that each extinction was actually directly caused will be harder to come by. E.g. maybe dire wolves died because their prey went extinct. And, we still don't know why bison survived.
- dash2 4y agoThis seems like a general argument that "unexpected bad things might happen". I agree, sure - but this argument applies equally to, for example, alien invasions or grey goo. The question I'm addressing is whether global warming will cause civilization to collapse or humans to go extinct. I claim no serious climate scientist thinks that.