3 ms·
There needs to be sunset provisions in laws by default that force them to be re-examined on a regular (3 year? 5 year?) basis showing the impact. The onus shoul
by voisin 4y ago
There needs to be sunset provisions in laws by default that force them to be re-examined on a regular (3 year? 5 year?) basis showing the impact. The onus should be on the government to show that their laws operated as intended or they should be removed by default.
- D13Fd 4y agoIt’s not “their” laws. It’s “our” laws if you live here and have a vote. The government doesn’t own us. We elect representatives and leaders who make laws (or appoint appointees who make regulations) following a prescribed process.
- voisin 4y agoAs much as I desperately want to agree with you, how often do you feel those who are elected share this sentiment? It certainly feels like an “us” versus “them” situation protected by boatloads of money ensuring “they” get to keep acting this way.
- bb88 4y agoWell... it's "theirs" if the laws were made 50 years ago when you didn't exist. There's a lot of crazy laws on the books.