3 ms·
>but to talk about them in the context of the recent Supreme Court decision is dishonest I disagree, this is an example of why data collection can be scary. D
by itsoktocry 4y ago
>but to talk about them in the context of the recent Supreme Court decision is dishonest
I disagree, this is an example of why data collection can be scary.
Data that was perfectly inane yesterday can be used against people tomorrow. How much data do the powers-that-be have access to that can be used similarly in the future? The dystopian view is that they'll be able to paint any narrative if you fall in their crosshairs. Of course who "they" are is subject to change.
- adamc 4y agoLiving in Texas, I strongly agree with you.
- core-utility 4y agoBut that's always been true, data can always be used against you regardless of what the laws are.
- vorpalhex 4y agoYou are fully and entirely correct. Now, really, ponder on that. Your instagram/Facebook likes alone reveal your gender, sexuality, relationship status and more. Add in a touch of PII to narrow it down to a single person.