> To explain, you'd need to know the truth Unless you have some imagination, in which case you can explain a hypothetical or a possible truth. > So you're jus

> To explain, you'd need to know the truth Unless you have some imagination, in which case you can explain a hypothetical or a possible truth. > So you're just assuming they're innocent The post you are responding to does not really suggest innocence overall, just perhaps they are guilty of something else (laziness or incompetence) in this instance and perhaps that they are covering that up.