5 ms·
What’s the plan of the closures? To import the food instead? But that’ll be more emissions not less won’t it? Just keep the emissions in a poorer country?
by chrisseaton 4y ago
What’s the plan of the closures? To import the food instead? But that’ll be more emissions not less won’t it? Just keep the emissions in a poorer country?
- niek_pas 4y agoAs I said in another comment, most of the food produced by these farmers is destined for export.
- chrisseaton 4y agoBut again, so it’ll just be grown elsewhere with the same or more emissions?
- jeroenhd 4y agoThe problem is currently with localised pollution, either near nature preserves or near places where construction is planned. Other European countries using much less intensive food production methods over much larger areas of land can take the increase in emissions quite well. This isn't a about global warming, though these compounds are definitely not helping the situation; this is about nitrogen rich compounds ending up in the ground where it shouldn't be.
- cute_boi 4y agoYes and no. Not all land are equal & not all surrounding ecosystem are same. For example growing palm trees has more bad effects in Indonesia compared to growing in country like India.
- zthrowaway 4y agoSo the lack of food being imported from this export needs to be balanced somewhere else, no? This would mean no reduction in emission. Only emission within this locale. I guess that's a win to make local numbers look good. This is so pointless. Not to mention we are taking away livelihoods from people.
- sockcupboard 4y agoNo, it is a local problem regarding local concentration. If the production elsewhere spreads out, they won't have these problems with their soil.
- chrisseaton 4y ago> a local problem So now it'll be a local problem... just for some other poorer people.
- sushibowl 4y agoNot necessarily. The problem is concentration, too much nitrogen oxides and ammonia compounds distributed over a small area. If production here is replaced by increased production spread out over the rest of the world, the problem is solved.
- tiku 4y agoThey must reduce their emissions. So they can cut down on certain food for the cattle or have less animals. Anyway no farm is closed yet and they can always start a lawsuit. There also are a lot of farmers that don't have any offspring or people to take over, so they can be bought out.
- jillesvangurp 4y agoExport less food. Where food is mainly cattle and poultry. The Netherlands exports a lot of food at the cost of the local environment. That has not been sustainable for a long time and the current government is being forced to act after having declined to do so for many years.
- baud147258 4y ago> Export less food. Where food is mainly cattle and poultry. So instead the meat will be produced elsewhere, so there would be no net change?
- jeroenhd 4y agoThat's the plan. Or we reduce our meat consumption, that's probably even better for the planet. It's a very localised problem to "move it somewhere else" is actually a possibility.
- baud147258 4y ago> Or we reduce our meat consumption, that's probably even better for the planet. I don't disagree on that.
- deleted 4y ago[deleted]
- deleted 4y ago[deleted]