2 ms·
> continuous improvement My experience so far is that this means permanent micromanagement because nobody can claim perfection. Might work for some people but
by peteradio 4y ago
> continuous improvement
My experience so far is that this means permanent micromanagement because nobody can claim perfection. Might work for some people but I couldn't find a way to view it but as insidious. When I left myself open to essentially permanent criticism of not just my output but how I produce my output at further granularity it led to a frankly confusing role where my manager might as well have been pervertedly resting his hands upon mine and trying to help me type better.
> Uhh Jim what are you doing?
> I don't want to do this but your typing KPIs are in the toilet, I want to try something.
> This isn't funny Jim, we seriously need to talk about the requirements I'm getting.
> You don't understand the requirements? We need to get in a meeting.
> I haven't received feedback on the last round of contradictions I reported.
> Let's get in a meeting after we work on your typing.
My suggestion was to fire Jim but that process improvement was denied.
- cntainer 4y agoAny process can easily be abused, especially when the people responsible for driving the process are doing it for the wrong reasons I think that shouldn't discredit the original concept though. > My suggestion was to fire Jim but that process improvement was denied. Funny, and maybe the best solution, given the scenario, but I guess my mind was set on more constructive criticism :)