3 ms·
In the first case (negligence) you were saving water. On the second case you were trying to kill the plants.
by pedro2 4y ago
In the first case (negligence) you were saving water.
On the second case you were trying to kill the plants.
- bayindirh 4y agoOh, so I can neglect the things as I wish in the name of saving proverbial water, and be free of all consequences at the end? That's great. Maybe we should try that.
- pedro2 4y agoPlease increase your level of flexible thinking so you can understand the comparison made. Thank you.
- bayindirh 4y agoMaybe I understood what you have said, but intentionally showed how it can be abused by thinking in a too flexible manner? Maybe we both should increase our flexibility in different perspectives. Thank you, too. :)
- pedro2 4y ago:) Well, if you really wish to go that far we can do a philosophy doctorate. Find me on Libera.chat, nick qa6.