5 ms·
I was a 6.3 as I stepped out of bed. I took a shower, shaved, brushed my teeth, put on a nice shirt, fixed my hair and offered a good angle of my best smile at
by kleene_op 4y ago
I was a 6.3 as I stepped out of bed.
I took a shower, shaved, brushed my teeth, put on a nice shirt, fixed my hair and offered a good angle of my best smile at the camera. I was now a 9.
- Hammershaft 4y agoInteresting! I thought it would be purely based on facial symmetry.
- mywittyname 4y agoI took off my glasses and jumped 2.5 points. If it were measuring symmetry, that wouldn't happen.
- jjoonathan 4y agoBald guy here -- let me assure you, symmetry is not the only factor, not for the algorithm and not for the people it represents :)
- deleted 4y ago[deleted]
- jeroenhd 4y agoI'm also reasonably sure other factors also influence these algorithms. Hair style, framing, lighting, the clothes found on your shoulders, angle, distortion by the camera lens, and most importantly, similarity to high-scoring faces in the source data set.
- altdataseller 4y agoI was a 6.3 but I felt pleasantly surprised because I personally think I'm a 1.5
- szatkus 4y agoSame. Their algorithm is broken.
- failedengineer 4y agoI got a 4.8... the model also told me I lied about my age by nearly 20 years, so that's nice. I'm a very young looking ugly.
- khendron 4y agoSame. It shaved 8 years off of me, and then called me ugly.
- rhexs 4y agoI’m wondering if this is scaled so 5 is quite low and 1-5 should be non-existent. Giving someone a 1 vs a “5” feels a little mean.
- blobbers 4y ago... I got a 5. When I smiled it bumped me up to 5.5 Fwiw, telling someone a 5 is a 1 is even meaner. :-/
- rossdavidh 4y agoThat's actually fairly similar to how humans would be influenced by showering, shaving, etc. so in some ways that's pretty impressive.