2 ms·
His analysis is based on the comparison between his grand father era and his mother area ; but this predicate is if not wrong, at least still unproved. He took
by greatgib 4y ago
His analysis is based on the comparison between his grand father era and his mother area ; but this predicate is if not wrong, at least still unproved.
He took a sample of 2 persons, with different characteristics and made deductions based on that. Nothing can't be deduced from his sample in fact.
For example, we compare at the same time a 'psychiatrist' from period X, to a 'dermatologist' from period Y.
Psychiatrists in general will not have the same mentality as dermatologists!
Medecines in the psychiatrist area will meddle with the brain and will try to affect the mood of a patient. Effects are hard to measure and side effects often unclear.
At the opposite, it is quite easy to see the effects and side effects of medecines in dermatology.
You can tell someone: go have a walk in the forest and your depression might pass, but your scabies problem will not resolve itself alone like that...
- plaguepilled 4y agoThank you, there needs to be way more statistical skepticism for situations like this.