Yes. In my own experience, either the product needed very little map features, and it didn't warrant paying in full just for that (I remember even live Google

Yes. In my own experience, either the product needed very little map features, and it didn't warrant paying in full just for that (I remember even live Google Maps integration being dismissed as "too costly" and moving to pre-rendered optimized maps). Either we needed a lot more maps, and having full access to the underlying data made more sense to limit computational overhead and better adapt to our use case. Basically map/location related features are hard and often costly, I expect companies to either avoid them completely or bite the bullet and go full in.