3 ms·

Calling a single sceptical statement "counter arguments" is disingenuous at best. The linked bidmc article is a good starting point if you really are interested

• qsdf38100 4y ago
  He quoted 3 sentences from the Wikipedia article, in addition to his own. All of which are relevant and valid points. You didn’t address any of those. Neither did you address his own. Even if it was only one, reasserting the author thesis, pretending to ask why he is dismissive while ignoring everything he brought is not a constructive contribution. It’s manipulative at best.