4 ms·
> close approximation of the thinking of the US's intelligence community; in that sense, they are significant Which means in that sense it will be very likely
by throw827474737 4y ago
> close approximation of the thinking of the US's intelligence community; in that sense, they are significant
Which means in that sense it will be very likely ridicously wrong?!
- concinds 4y agoIf you post nonsense replies you are just disincentivizing anyone thoughtful from posting here. To reply (though you were perfectly capable of this thought yourself): Obviously; but it gives us a frame to understand geopolitical behavior by the US as it happens, and before it happens. Edward Gibbon described “secret intrigues of the palace” (palace intrigue) as “those trifling but decisive causes which so often influence the fate of empires.” Stratfor is the Pentagon's palace intrigue (several steps removed). If you've ever read Stratfor you know they expect, and plan for, the disintegration of Russia and China into smaller republics; and you can tell I don't believe in that. It is merely an indication that the US likely now sees Germany as a second-rate ally, irrelevant to its geopolitical future; and therefore doesn't care about the sanctions' effect on Germany. That is the only reason I brought it up.
- YarickR2 4y agoWell, "Fuck the EU", as Nuland famously proclaimed 8 years ago in Ukraine. As it stands, EU is being consistently and thoroughly fucked . https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-26079957 https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-26079957