4 ms·
He stated exactly why he was dismissive. You merely reassert the author main point, but fail to address the counter arguments he gave.
by qsdf38100 4y ago
He stated exactly why he was dismissive.
You merely reassert the author main point, but fail to address the counter arguments he gave.
- wfme 4y agoCalling a single sceptical statement "counter arguments" is disingenuous at best. The linked bidmc article is a good starting point if you really are interested.
- qsdf38100 4y agoHe quoted 3 sentences from the Wikipedia article, in addition to his own. All of which are relevant and valid points. You didn’t address any of those. Neither did you address his own. Even if it was only one, reasserting the author thesis, pretending to ask why he is dismissive while ignoring everything he brought is not a constructive contribution. It’s manipulative at best.