21 ms·
First, you're sample size of 10 people has no value. Second mathematics is just one degree and can not be used as a representation of all degrees. Finally actua
by themitigating 4y ago
First, you're sample size of 10 people has no value.
Second mathematics is just one degree and can not be used as a representation of all degrees. Finally actuaries are just on career that someone with a math degree might get so that total number doesn't have value when talking about the potential of a math degree
- solardev 4y agoFor anyone interested in a statistical analysis of this stuff, here's one example: https://freopp.org/is-college-worth-it-a-comprehensive-return-on-investment-analysis-1b2ad17f84c8 https://freopp.org/is-college-worth-it-a-comprehensive-retur... They are a libertarian thinktank, so take it with a grain of salt, but it's a lot more data than we've had in this thread so far. TLDR: Engineering pays, computers pay almost as much, art and music are usually a net negative (over 42 working years). Looking at math, 88% of graduates will earn a 42-year ROI of <=$1,000,000, which means most of them are earning an additional $24k/year on top of what they could've expected to earn without a degree ("counterfactual earnings": https://freopp.org/how-we-calculated-the-return-on-investment-of-a-college-degree-e93bce69f9c7 https://freopp.org/how-we-calculated-the-return-on-investmen...). Only 3% of math majors should expect a negative ROI (i.e., they would've been better off NOT getting their degree). By comparison, 68% of art & music majors will have a negative ROI on their degree.