> The idea of UI being a pure function of the model seems so obviously incorrect, and leads to such a plethora of problems, that it is a bit puzzling how one co

> The idea of UI being a pure function of the model seems so obviously incorrect, and leads to such a plethora of problems, that it is a bit puzzling how one could come up with it in the first place, and certainly how one would stick with it in face of the avalanche of problems that just keeps coming. Richard Harris takes the same tact. He describes “UIs as a function of state” as an ideology: https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1PUvpXMBEDS45rd0wHu6tF3j_8wmGC6cOLtOw2hzU-mw/preview?slide=id.p https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1PUvpXMBEDS45rd0wHu6t... I think junior developers tend to invest in a single web framework and let their identities get tied up in the architecture of that framework.