3 ms·
The difference between superficial knowledge and real knowledge is nicely illustrated in one of Feynman's little stories: "So we went alone for our walk in the
by nhebb 15y ago
The difference between superficial knowledge and real knowledge is nicely illustrated in one of Feynman's little stories:
"So we went alone for our walk in the woods. But mothers were very powerful in those days as they are now, and they convinced the other fathers that they had to take their own sons out for walks in the woods. So all fathers took all sons out for walks in the woods one Sunday afternoon. The next day, Monday, we were playing in the fields and this boy said to me, "See that bird standing on the stump there? What's the name of it?"
I said, "I haven't got the slightest idea."
He said, "It’s a brown-throated thrush. Your father doesn't teach you much about science."
I smiled to myself, because my father had already taught me that [the name] doesn't tell me anything about the bird. He taught me "See that bird? It's a brown-throated thrush, but in Germany it's called a halsenflugel, and in Chinese they call it a chung ling and even if you know all those names for it, you still know nothing about the bird--you only know something about people; what they call that bird. Now that thrush sings, and teaches its young to fly, and flies so many miles away during the summer across the country, and nobody knows how it finds its way," and so forth. There is a difference between the name of the thing and what goes on."
- vixen99 15y agoA wonderful story well worth reproducing here! Don't want to be churlish but I somehow doubt Feynman wrote the plural of days as day's.
- nhebb 15y agoCorrected. BTW, I quoted it from "What is Science?" on the Friends of Tuva site. The whole piece is a good read: http://www.fotuva.org/feynman/what_is_science.html http://www.fotuva.org/feynman/what_is_science.html
- UjjwolL 15y agoI think it is quite different, the term for anything says many thing about the thing itself in Indian Languages. If the term doesn't say anything about it more than what to call it, then the term is not correct.