3 ms·
React components don't function like regular JS functions, but look like regular functions. So that's obviously not a legitimate knock against them - you're wor
by thatswrong0 4y ago
React components don't function like regular JS functions, but look like regular functions. So that's obviously not a legitimate knock against them - you're working within the React runtime. It's not normal Javascript.
And lifecycle methods are just as "magical" as hooks. If you just thought about why the "rules of hooks" exist for a moment instead of just hating change for the sake of it existing, you could probably intuit how they work under the hood.
Lastly, lifecycle methods don't allow you to co-locate feature-related code, can actually create more bugs (if you have logic in `componentDidMount` but forget to add something similar to `componentDidUpdate` for example), and any logic contained within lifecycle methods isn't composable / reusable.
I really don't understand where you're coming from at all with this.
- lifeplusplus 4y agoReact should act like a framework/library, not become a transpiler and create javascript 2.0. It's hugely confusing, and harder to reason. I shouldn't have to learn about internals of the library to figure out what's wrong with my code. it's a smell of bad library, this wasn't the problem when simple class functions were used as lifecycle methods.