3 ms·
I haven't seen anyone claim that it was hard to manufacture. Sadly, the answer seems to be that Robertson screwed up the initial licensing so badly that the te
by nkurz 4y ago
I haven't seen anyone claim that it was hard to manufacture. Sadly, the answer seems to be that Robertson screwed up the initial licensing so badly that the technically worse Phillips took over the market. Here's an account: https://www.thomasnet.com/articles/hardware/robertson-screwdriver-history/ https://www.thomasnet.com/articles/hardware/robertson-screwd...
Some people try to argue that Phillips was actually superior, since it cams out rather than breaks, but I feel like they are just making excuses. I'm confused why Robertson/Square is still so hard to find in the US. I don't think my local Home Depot carries any. Torx (which is just about as good) occupies the niche it would otherwise have.
- selcuka 4y ago> Some people try to argue that Phillips was actually superior, since it cams out rather than breaks, but I feel like they are just making excuses. To be honest I like that square heads just break as I can simply hide the hole and drill a new one instead of trying to remove the stripped head.
- cf100clunk 4y agoHenry Ford seems to come off lightly in that article. Legend has it that his terms were almost exclusive, so Robertson walked: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R-mDqKtivuI https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R-mDqKtivuI