3 ms·
This gets repeated in every thread about front-end tech, and every time people have to repeat the same explanation. SSR is not PHP. SSR allows you to run the sa
by woojoo666 4y ago
This gets repeated in every thread about front-end tech, and every time people have to repeat the same explanation. SSR is not PHP. SSR allows you to run the same code on client and server. You get to use client-side frameworks, but the page is rendered before it even reaches the client.
If people could try to understand SSR before diminishing it, we could have much more productive discussions. But as of now the frequency of these uninformed comments makes me feel like people who are ignorant about front-end, are somehow proud of their ignorance.
- asciiresort 4y ago> but the page is rendered before it even reaches the client Which is what PHP was built for. > If people could try to understand SSR before diminishing it, we could have much more productive discussions. If new generation of frontend people could try to understand PHP before diminishing it, we could have much more productive discussions.
- woojoo666 4y agoYou can't just crop out half the sentence and make an equivalency. The full sentence was > You get to use client-side frameworks, but the page is rendered before it even reaches the client Does PHP run in the client? No? Then it's not the same as SSR. You have it completely backwards. I understand PHP but you clearly don't understand SSR