3 ms·
This is pretty cool - quantum behavior is really not intuitive and being able to play with it helps clarify it I do wish each level had more explanation about
by ford 4y ago
This is pretty cool - quantum behavior is really not intuitive and being able to play with it helps clarify it
I do wish each level had more explanation about the concept it's teaching. You can figure things out if you know a small amount about how quantum mechanics work (like knowing once you measure something the superposition collapses) but the game would be a better teaching tool if there were explanations before/after you complete a level
For people interested in QM but without a physics/math background Carlo Rovelli has a book called Helgoland that explains a lot of the basics in a non-technical way
- westurner 4y ago> if you know a small amount about how quantum mechanics work (like knowing once you measure something the superposition collapses) FWIU it's possible to infer from nearby particles without incurring Heisenberg (and/or Bell's?) with Quantum Tagging? "Helgoland" (2020) https://g.co/kgs/wZXRKQ https://g.co/kgs/wZXRKQ The other day I found a quantum circuit puzzle game called "QuantumQ" that has you add a Hadamard gate - statistical superposition - without requiring really any QM at all; which may imply that applied EA could solve the defined problems. ray-pH/quantumQ: https://github.com/ray-pH/quantumQ https://github.com/ray-pH/quantumQ Quantum logic gate https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quantum_logic_gate https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quantum_logic_gate #Hadamard_gate