2 ms·
> $470k for a license to do CGNAT at 100gbit/sec. Surely these guys are opening themselves up to be replaced with some cheaper open source based software soluti
by klabb3 4y ago
> $470k for a license to do CGNAT at 100gbit/sec. Surely these guys are opening themselves up to be replaced with some cheaper open source based software solution?
Good. CGNAT needs to die. Addressing is fundamental and customers deserve not just an address, but their own RANGE, especially now that it's feasible.
- znpy 4y agoi'd love to be able to also ask for the reverse-dns zone to be delegated... if i've got a public subnet, it would be lovely to be able to use it properly. a man can dream.