3 ms·
You're missing the point. There is an existing social structure of people who do care about these titles and the titles are often attached to assets or position
by elefanten 4y ago
You're missing the point. There is an existing social structure of people who do care about these titles and the titles are often attached to assets or positions of power.
To your original point -- she went to jail for committing fraud, as in theft via lying. She did not go to jail for being judged "unworthy" by some dogmatic social circle.
- JoeAltmaier 4y agoI disagree. She went to jail because she claimed to be a magical being, and others thought they knew she wasn't. Consider: would an actual peer have gone to jail? No? Then she went to jail for 'not being a magical person'.
- ctvo 4y agoI honestly can't tell if your series of replies have been GPT-3 generated. She went to jail because she failed to pay for the goods and services she used. They extended her credit because of the false pretenses, but she went to jail for grand larceny. Yes, an actual noble would go to jail for a similar crime.
- JoeAltmaier 4y agoNo an 'actual noble' (whatever the heck that is) might not have even been prosecuted. But how many famous people have avoided jail for similar issues? If you're famous enough it doesn't even go to trial. That's my point. She didn't pass some popularity contest because {reasons} and got prosecuted. Which may likely not have happened to a duchess or whatnot.