3 ms·

It’s funny how unflinchingly the narrative shifted from “bitcoin is an inflation hedge outside of government control” to “the government is manipulating the pri

by paulgb 4y ago

It’s funny how unflinchingly the narrative shifted from “bitcoin is an inflation hedge outside of government control” to “the government is manipulating the price of bitcoin through inflation”

thr0wawayf00 4y ago
And it completely ignores the bubble that the crypto world created through things like NFTs, whose only value to their owners is the promise that they'll be worth more tomorrow. It's just the digital incarnation of Beanie Babies.
- sprash 4y ago
  The "everything bubble" which also affected crpyto was created by central banks with the various QE programs and the relentless money printing. Don't blame crypto for creating a bubble.
  - thr0wawayf00 4y ago
    You can absolutely blame crypto for creating the NFT bubble. The banks flooded the economy with cash but they didn't tell everyone to start buying NFTs. All of these exchanges, stablecoins and crypto-derivative products were built solely on the self-propagating hype that needed the cheap cash flowing into the system. The banks didn't tell anyone to go buy crypto, the crypto companies did, which effectively tied the performance of the crypto market to the stock market because the average consumer saw crypto as a more enticing speculative investment, not a currency. If the crypto community was as focused on the fundamentals as you argue, there would be a lot more conversations around not allowing these billion-dollar exchanges creating derivative products with unsustainable rates to capture the market. But they did and the crypto world is where it is today because of it. The Fed may have cut the trees down, but the crypto community threw them in a pile, doused them in gas and set the whole thing on fire and it wound up burning out of control. How do you blame the Fed for the fire?
kkielhofner 4y ago
A partial list of narrative shifts after each use case/benefit proved to be infeasible: - Digital cash (volatility, transaction rate, gas fees, etc). Only potential counter argument here is Lightning which essentially compromises on many of the original design goals of Bitcoin and comes with its own set of issues[1] PLUS still has the pesky volatility problem - Store of value (Volatility) - Inflation hedge (Volatility, essentially tracks other markets) - Outside government control (Law enforcement and tax authorities routinely seize, tax, and disrupt cryptocurrencies). There is the “fleeing a dictator” scenario but that’s a very limited use case that in no way supports the current market value. - Banking the unbanked, remittances (See El Salvador [2]). Money quote from the article: “There is no experiment where a currency was introduced with such strong incentives and still failed,” Fernando Álvarez, an economist at the University of Chicago I feel like registering “whatarewecallingbitcointoday.com” or some such to track these. 1 - https://medium.com/bitcoin-blockchain/lightning-network-on-btc-is-a-dead-end-even-if-it-works-as-claimed-d550d17053b1 https://medium.com/bitcoin-blockchain/lightning-network-on-b... 2 - https://restofworld.org/2022/el-salvador-chivo-bitcoin-wallet/ https://restofworld.org/2022/el-salvador-chivo-bitcoin-walle...
- sprash 4y ago
  Those are all made up narratives by random media outlets. From the beginning there was only one true narrative: "Abolish central banks". Because they are at the core designed to enslave humanity. That is why Bitcoin is created. It was always an attempt to solve a political problem with technology. Not more not less. Will it succeed? I hope so.
  - paulgb 4y ago
    The digital cash use case is literally in the whitepaper title, “Bitcoin: A Peer-to-Peer Electronic Cash System”
  - kkielhofner 4y ago
    I have yet to receive a point by point rebuttal with any kind of real data or sourcing. It always ends up in deflection or something along the lines of a conspiracy theory (any debate of which is infamously unproductive). I would like for blockchain technology to find its rightful place as a unique solution to a real problem with actual user adoption and meaningful real world impact but after 13 years, substantial investment, and several pivots/rebrands/etc it hasn't been successful at anything (relative to the total potential user base/"addressable market" of 5 billion internet users). I like to look at it as if Bitcoin (and to a larger extent blockchain) were a single technology startup. Let's call it "Blockchain Inc". If it weren't for the religious fervor of true believers, speculators, "hodlers" doing anything and everything to pump it, etc no investor or group of investors in their right mind would keep pouring untold billions of dollars into Blockchain Inc after its pivoted over half a dozen times, still has essentially no real world use case, and no meaningful user adoption (when compared to other 13 years old startups, platforms, technologies, etc with or without equivalent investment). It's a failed tech startup being propped up by speculation and its own engine of propaganda and constructed media narrative.

by paulgb 4y ago

thr0wawayf00 4y ago

And it completely ignores the bubble that the crypto world created through things like NFTs, whose only value to their owners is the promise that they'll be worth more tomorrow. It's just the digital incarnation of Beanie Babies.

sprash 4y ago
The "everything bubble" which also affected crpyto was created by central banks with the various QE programs and the relentless money printing. Don't blame crypto for creating a bubble.
- thr0wawayf00 4y ago
  You can absolutely blame crypto for creating the NFT bubble. The banks flooded the economy with cash but they didn't tell everyone to start buying NFTs. All of these exchanges, stablecoins and crypto-derivative products were built solely on the self-propagating hype that needed the cheap cash flowing into the system. The banks didn't tell anyone to go buy crypto, the crypto companies did, which effectively tied the performance of the crypto market to the stock market because the average consumer saw crypto as a more enticing speculative investment, not a currency. If the crypto community was as focused on the fundamentals as you argue, there would be a lot more conversations around not allowing these billion-dollar exchanges creating derivative products with unsustainable rates to capture the market. But they did and the crypto world is where it is today because of it. The Fed may have cut the trees down, but the crypto community threw them in a pile, doused them in gas and set the whole thing on fire and it wound up burning out of control. How do you blame the Fed for the fire?

kkielhofner 4y ago

A partial list of narrative shifts after each use case/benefit proved to be infeasible: - Digital cash (volatility, transaction rate, gas fees, etc). Only potential counter argument here is Lightning which essentially compromises on many of the original design goals of Bitcoin and comes with its own set of issues[1] PLUS still has the pesky volatility problem - Store of value (Volatility) - Inflation hedge (Volatility, essentially tracks other markets) - Outside government control (Law enforcement and tax authorities routinely seize, tax, and disrupt cryptocurrencies). There is the “fleeing a dictator” scenario but that’s a very limited use case that in no way supports the current market value. - Banking the unbanked, remittances (See El Salvador [2]). Money quote from the article: “There is no experiment where a currency was introduced with such strong incentives and still failed,” Fernando Álvarez, an economist at the University of Chicago I feel like registering “whatarewecallingbitcointoday.com” or some such to track these. 1 - https://medium.com/bitcoin-blockchain/lightning-network-on-btc-is-a-dead-end-even-if-it-works-as-claimed-d550d17053b1 https://medium.com/bitcoin-blockchain/lightning-network-on-b... 2 - https://restofworld.org/2022/el-salvador-chivo-bitcoin-wallet/ https://restofworld.org/2022/el-salvador-chivo-bitcoin-walle...

sprash 4y ago
Those are all made up narratives by random media outlets. From the beginning there was only one true narrative: "Abolish central banks". Because they are at the core designed to enslave humanity. That is why Bitcoin is created. It was always an attempt to solve a political problem with technology. Not more not less. Will it succeed? I hope so.
- paulgb 4y ago
  The digital cash use case is literally in the whitepaper title, “Bitcoin: A Peer-to-Peer Electronic Cash System”
- kkielhofner 4y ago
  I have yet to receive a point by point rebuttal with any kind of real data or sourcing. It always ends up in deflection or something along the lines of a conspiracy theory (any debate of which is infamously unproductive). I would like for blockchain technology to find its rightful place as a unique solution to a real problem with actual user adoption and meaningful real world impact but after 13 years, substantial investment, and several pivots/rebrands/etc it hasn't been successful at anything (relative to the total potential user base/"addressable market" of 5 billion internet users). I like to look at it as if Bitcoin (and to a larger extent blockchain) were a single technology startup. Let's call it "Blockchain Inc". If it weren't for the religious fervor of true believers, speculators, "hodlers" doing anything and everything to pump it, etc no investor or group of investors in their right mind would keep pouring untold billions of dollars into Blockchain Inc after its pivoted over half a dozen times, still has essentially no real world use case, and no meaningful user adoption (when compared to other 13 years old startups, platforms, technologies, etc with or without equivalent investment). It's a failed tech startup being propped up by speculation and its own engine of propaganda and constructed media narrative.