3 ms·
Hide Nothing
- deleted 4y ago[deleted]
- josephcsible 4y agoThis article seems really bizarre. With all rights and freedoms, there's cases of "you have to take the bad with the good", but this article uses the bad to argue for why privacy is important, instead of the good. It's like if you used Nazi rallies as an example of why free speech is important. I think the author might actually be against privacy, and so trying to make people who actually care about it look stupid.