> all 10 companies underperformed. That’s compelling, but not quite statistically significant. I would say at a rate of 10/10, those results don’t need statist

> all 10 companies underperformed. That’s compelling, but not quite statistically significant. I would say at a rate of 10/10, those results don’t need statistics to be considered significant, the only issue is the sample size could be larger. Am I missing something? Or is the author conflating significance with confidence?