5 ms·

Things can change though. For decades rich disgusting guys were abusing young girls and women, without repurcussions, until the #metoo movement sent the Weinste

Things can change though. For decades rich disgusting guys were abusing young girls and women, without repurcussions, until the #metoo movement sent the Weinsteins, the R‘Kellys, the Epsteins and their helpers and others to jail.

newsclues 4y ago
IF things change, which clients of convicted sex trafficker Maxwell we’re also charged and convicted after being named in the public courtroom that the world is watching instead of celebrity court?
ihm 4y ago
Those are all limited hang outs. Abuse is endemic in Hollywood, Weinstein and Bill Cosby were scapegoats. I’m sure things have continued as they did before a few people went to jail. Similarly with Epstein. Prince Andrew, Bill Clinton, Trump, Gates. None of them will ever face consequences.
- atoav 4y ago
  > None of them will ever face consequences. If this is how we decided it is, they will not. Sadly an awful lot of people already decided that this is an unchangable law of nature — and by doing so they are complicit.
bdangubic 4y ago
If #metoo movement really brought up meaningful changes who would be in jail is clinton, trump, gates, not weinstein and rkelly…
- themitigating 4y ago
  What would Clinton, Gates, and Trump be guily of related to metoo?
  - deleted 4y ago
    [deleted]
  - fifticon 4y ago
    Their activities on epstein island, but the judge on ghislaine maxwell's case found it prudent to redact the information that surfaced. https://www.thedailybeast.com/judge-allows-ghislaine-maxwell-to-redact-sensational-and-impure-details-from-court-filing https://www.thedailybeast.com/judge-allows-ghislaine-maxwell...
    - n4r9 4y ago
      Clinton and Trump have also faced a string of sexual misconduct allegations going back decades.
    - themitigating 4y ago
      The Daily Beast article you linked to is a blurb from https://lawandcrime.com/high-profile/judge-rules-some-ghislaine-maxwell-details-are-too-sensational-and-impure-to-be-revealed-to-the-public/ https://lawandcrime.com/high-profile/judge-rules-some-ghisla... That article is talking about a ruling a judge made. The ruling is available here (https://www.scribd.com/document/499328774/G-Maxwell-Ruling-3-18-2021#download&from_embed https://www.scribd.com/document/499328774/G-Maxwell-Ruling-3...). "Clinton" or "Trump" does not appear anywhere in the ruling or article.
account42 4y ago
> the Epsteins and their helpers Still waiting for even one of their clients to be charged.

newsclues 4y ago

IF things change, which clients of convicted sex trafficker Maxwell we’re also charged and convicted after being named in the public courtroom that the world is watching instead of celebrity court?

ihm 4y ago

Those are all limited hang outs. Abuse is endemic in Hollywood, Weinstein and Bill Cosby were scapegoats. I’m sure things have continued as they did before a few people went to jail. Similarly with Epstein. Prince Andrew, Bill Clinton, Trump, Gates. None of them will ever face consequences.

atoav 4y ago
> None of them will ever face consequences. If this is how we decided it is, they will not. Sadly an awful lot of people already decided that this is an unchangable law of nature — and by doing so they are complicit.

bdangubic 4y ago

If #metoo movement really brought up meaningful changes who would be in jail is clinton, trump, gates, not weinstein and rkelly…

themitigating 4y ago
What would Clinton, Gates, and Trump be guily of related to metoo?
- deleted 4y ago
  [deleted]
- fifticon 4y ago
  Their activities on epstein island, but the judge on ghislaine maxwell's case found it prudent to redact the information that surfaced. https://www.thedailybeast.com/judge-allows-ghislaine-maxwell-to-redact-sensational-and-impure-details-from-court-filing https://www.thedailybeast.com/judge-allows-ghislaine-maxwell...
  - n4r9 4y ago
    Clinton and Trump have also faced a string of sexual misconduct allegations going back decades.
  - themitigating 4y ago
    The Daily Beast article you linked to is a blurb from https://lawandcrime.com/high-profile/judge-rules-some-ghislaine-maxwell-details-are-too-sensational-and-impure-to-be-revealed-to-the-public/ https://lawandcrime.com/high-profile/judge-rules-some-ghisla... That article is talking about a ruling a judge made. The ruling is available here (https://www.scribd.com/document/499328774/G-Maxwell-Ruling-3-18-2021#download&from_embed https://www.scribd.com/document/499328774/G-Maxwell-Ruling-3...). "Clinton" or "Trump" does not appear anywhere in the ruling or article.

account42 4y ago

> the Epsteins and their helpers Still waiting for even one of their clients to be charged.