>We are legally obligated to publish the source code running on our servers This is not a guarantee until it is challenged in court or audited by some trusted

>We are legally obligated to publish the source code running on our servers This is not a guarantee until it is challenged in court or audited by some trusted auditor. >This take also seems especially outlandish considering that the context is comparing SourceHut to GitHub, which is very clearly more proprietary even in this awkward sense. No disagreement there.