3 ms·
I don't think that's a reasonable take. We are legally obligated to publish the source code running on our servers because we have incorporated code from others
by ddevault 4y ago
I don't think that's a reasonable take. We are legally obligated to publish the source code running on our servers because we have incorporated code from others under the terms of the AGPL, without asking for them to assign copyright to us. This take also seems especially outlandish considering that the context is comparing SourceHut to GitHub, which is very clearly more proprietary even in this awkward sense.
- Arnavion 4y ago>We are legally obligated to publish the source code running on our servers This is not a guarantee until it is challenged in court or audited by some trusted auditor. >This take also seems especially outlandish considering that the context is comparing SourceHut to GitHub, which is very clearly more proprietary even in this awkward sense. No disagreement there.
- ddevault 4y agoI still find the insinuation quite ridiculous, to be entirely honest.