4 ms·
Previously, in 2016, with ninety-six comments: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=11830108 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=11830108
by spa3thyb 4y ago
Previously, in 2016, with ninety-six comments:
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=11830108 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=11830108
- dredmorbius 4y agoUnimpressed by the piece. I'd commented at the time: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=11838376 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=11838376 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=11833641 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=11833641 Nothing to add to either assessment. I wouldn't mind hearing an informed Google(r) viewpoint.