Some of the numbers in this article suggest a considerable bias coming from "an energy entrepreneur". His 'facts' disagree with those of reputable energy scient

Some of the numbers in this article suggest a considerable bias coming from "an energy entrepreneur". His 'facts' disagree with those of reputable energy scientists. One example: >Nuclear plants can operate for over 80 years and run for 100 years if they are well-maintained. Also true of human beings. But >Among plants built before 1973, fully HALF did not make it to 40 years, or much beyond that, before closing down. [https://saplnh.org/about-nuclear/nuclear-plant-lifespans/ https://saplnh.org/about-nuclear/nuclear-plant-lifespans/] And: > By contrast, solar panels and wind turbines last only about 20 years. Solar panels: >Most solar panel companies will provide a standard 25-year warranty for the expected life expectancy of the solar panels.... [After 25 years Tier1 panels lose about 6% of original output.] [https://www.solarreviews.com/blog/how-long-do-solar-panels-last https://www.solarreviews.com/blog/how-long-do-solar-panels-l...] Enough ... to show that the article is written to persuade, not inform.