As I write this comment, the Digiconomist estimates for the Bitcoin network is 129.74 TWh The Cambridge University estimate for the Bitcoin network is 92.93 TW

As I write this comment, the Digiconomist estimates for the Bitcoin network is 129.74 TWh The Cambridge University estimate for the Bitcoin network is 92.93 TWh with a lower bound of 51.01 TWh and an upper bound of 153.61 TWh. (I don't see an Ethereum comparison on the Cambridge site, so I can't check those numbers) Given that the Digiconomist estimate is within the bounds of the Cambridge estimate, I don't see how this is really a debunking. I'm not really inclined to put too much faith into an article from "Bitcoin Magazine" on the topic when a quick look at the numbers shows that the two primary sources don't really disagree and have similar estimates.