3 ms·
> The color science is missed up in Darktable […], I just couldn't get something decent out. If you want help you need to explain what you did or tried. Did yo
by mikae1 4y ago
> The color science is missed up in Darktable […], I just couldn't get something decent out.
If you want help you need to explain what you did or tried. Did you work in display referred or scene referred? I can recommend submitting one of your raw files to a Play Raw[0]. People will edit your raw file and send back an .xmp file with the edit metadata so that you can see what they did.
[0] https://discuss.pixls.us/c/processing/playraw/30
- H_L 4y agoTook a quick look at some posts there and this stood out: https://discuss.pixls.us/t/extreme-highlight-recovery-in-darktable/28668 https://discuss.pixls.us/t/extreme-highlight-recovery-in-dar... In my opinion, the Lightroom edit in the OP is the best. Many of the replies with Darktable edits look extremely bad. Some have extreme color artifacts.
- orbital-decay 4y agoHighlight reconstruction was a major and well-known shortcoming in versions they were using. Better highlight reconstruction for large blown-out areas was finally added in darktable 4.0.