3 ms·
Here's a contemporary site where the users discuss their confusion. "When did "Medireview" = Medieval???" https://www.enworld.org/threads/when-did-medireview-
by bcraven 4y ago
Here's a contemporary site where the users discuss their confusion.
"When did "Medireview" = Medieval???"
https://www.enworld.org/threads/when-did-medireview-medieval.4600/ https://www.enworld.org/threads/when-did-medireview-medieval...
- jeanlucas 4y agoThat's some nice collateral effect
- doodlesdev 4y ago> Actually, it appears to be a real term and not a mistake. I'm finding "medireview" in a lot of places on the web in place of the more traditional "medieval," even in university and college catalogs. > Interesting. This is the funniest forum thread I've seen in ages
- re 4y agoAnother humorous example from the second page of that thread: > speaking of which, did anyone else who owns the 2e Wizard's Spell Compendium notice that the term "dawizard" appeared wherever "damage" should have been?
- iggldiggl 4y ago"It was as if a light had been Nookd…" (https://languagelog.ldc.upenn.edu/nll/?p=3994 https://languagelog.ldc.upenn.edu/nll/?p=3994)