>Why does feedly imagine I would want to pay £5/month to read rss feeds? Microsoft and Adobe need massive scale to charge prices that low. They're each probabl

>Why does feedly imagine I would want to pay £5/month to read rss feeds? Microsoft and Adobe need massive scale to charge prices that low. They're each probably 10,000x-100,000x larger than Feedly in terms of end-user licenses. For a service I find useful enough to choose over a free alternative, I'm happy to pay $5-30/month to fund development and maintenance. I don't want all my software coming from the Microsofts and Adobes of the world.