4 ms·
Agreed! It makes me suspect that there are other, similar alternatives to popular websites. If I weren't so self-conscious, I'd start an "Ask HN: lite sites?"
by Agamus 4y ago
Agreed! It makes me suspect that there are other, similar alternatives to popular websites.
If I weren't so self-conscious, I'd start an "Ask HN: lite sites?" thread.
- capableweb 4y ago> If I weren't so self-conscious, I'd start an "Ask HN: lite sites?" thread. If you're using Firefox, every site has a "lite" version, via Firefox's reader mode. https://support.mozilla.org/en-US/kb/firefox-reader-view-clutter-free-web-pages https://support.mozilla.org/en-US/kb/firefox-reader-view-clu...
- Agamus 4y agoThank you - I've only ever used Firefox and forks thereof, but I ignore all the new bells and whistles that come with releases (since v2). This is one to which I should have paid attention! That said, it seems most of the sites I touch do not have a 'reader mode' option. Perhaps I should and will visit those sites less! Who else reads lots of the internet in source, to avoid responsivity and cetera? Try reader view, it's rad!
- SilasX 4y agoIME, that’s not quite true. Like with UI extensions, it depends entirely on a site’s willingness to adhere to interoperability standards, and some are structured in a way that disrupts reader mode. Good advice in general though.
- reducesuffering 4y agombasic.facebook.com and m.uber.com