> more intelligence and more money and power to improve the environment. > was done by a very small number of very rich countries And where do you think the (

> more intelligence and more money and power to improve the environment. > was done by a very small number of very rich countries And where do you think the (actionable) "intelligence" and money comes from? It's not that poorer countries don't have intelligence, but they don't have the resources to put it to good use. One random person in a TED talk gets more attention than the people actually dealing with the issue "More population" has always meant more misery and more conflict With less people, each one can go further