The claim was that going from state A to state B to engage in sex would use the minimum of the two states' ages of consent. That is still false. What you are d

The claim was that going from state A to state B to engage in sex would use the minimum of the two states' ages of consent. That is still false. What you are describing is the _federal_ aoc applying if interstate travel was involved. In the case of online activity, the act is considered to be happening in both states, without involving fedgov due to no state lines being crossed. None of this has anything to do with an act occurring entirely in state A and being subject to state B's laws. This is what's under discussion with abortion.