3 ms·
I agree 100% with your post. Clearly the USSC has made monumental mistakes in the past, so you don't want it to be infallible. But, you also don't want it to be
by googlryas 4y ago
I agree 100% with your post. Clearly the USSC has made monumental mistakes in the past, so you don't want it to be infallible. But, you also don't want it to be subject to the vagaries of the short term, where balance may lie one way or the other based on a certain appointment or a momentary lopsidedness.
Maybe requiring a 6-3 vote to overturn USSC rulings? But then who enforces that? I don't think Congress could pass that law?