4 ms·
> You claim V is as fast as C but there are many many many cases where V is slower than C. On average, V seems to be much slower than any compiled language. Th
by amedvednikov 4y ago
> You claim V is as fast as C but there are many many many cases where V is slower than C. On average, V seems to be much slower than any compiled language.
This is false.
> Everyone wants you and V to succeed
The same people who write articles about V and say V should die?
- nabakin 4y ago> This is false. Ok could you provide some benchmarks supporting this? I admit the article could be cherry picking benchmarks. > The same people who write articles about V and say V should die? Anyone saying that is probably fed up with the inaccurate claims. If you just make it clear to the user what features are in progress and that V is in an experimental state, I don't think anyone reasonable would have a problem with it. Do you understand what I'm saying with the rest of my comment? Languages typically have a lot higher threshold of quality (a lot less bugs) when they say they have a feature implemented or when they say the language is "relatively stable".
- amedvednikov 4y agoSure. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pvP6wmcl_Sc https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pvP6wmcl_Sc > they expect V to compile itself in less than a second for the general case (not just one very specific case). What on earth are you talking about? There's no specific case. Check the video. Try it yourself. Have you actually tried it? Can you list the inaccurate claims here please and in progress features that are not clear to the user?
- deleted 4y ago[deleted]