3 ms·
But that's my point... I went to a normal school. Even though it was religious, I wasn't exposed to any conservative ideas (religious != political conservatism)
by anon291 4y ago
But that's my point... I went to a normal school. Even though it was religious, I wasn't exposed to any conservative ideas (religious != political conservatism). The school kinda went along with the general zeitgeist. Perhaps your experience is different. We did a cursory (and I mean extremely cursory) view of all world religions, as I think many schools may offer, but we never went in depth.
But again, religion is not conservatism, whether political or even social (Stoicism is a 'conservative' philosophy, despite not being religious and perhaps even anti-religious).
It wasn't until I was older that I began studying these topics in any great detail.
> Personally I can say that I've learned a much greater depth about religion and spirituality outside of formal religious contacts.
That's not really germaine. Did you learn it in a public school? Because if not, I think my point stands.
- xpe 4y ago>> Personally I can say that I've learned a much greater depth about religion and spirituality outside of formal religious contacts. > That's not really germaine. Did you learn it in a public school? Because if not, I think my point stands. I took classes in history, philosophy, and ethics at a public university (one with considerable public funding). My public high school, on the other hand, had very limited capabilities or structure for teaching liberal arts well.
- anon291 4y agoUniversities are different. No one here is suggesting 'homeschooling' university (whatever that means)