Disagreed. I see this as perfectly rational in given their business model and regulatory environment they operate in. Their business relies on ad revenue (deri

Disagreed. I see this as perfectly rational in given their business model and regulatory environment they operate in. Their business relies on ad revenue (derived from video views) and they are no regulations that hold them liable for hosting dangerous content, nor for mistakenly-deleted content. Therefore the rational thing to do is let the mistakenly-deleted videos down (reviewing them manually would cost too much) while leaving anything else that doesn't trip the spam filter up (since they generate ad views).