4 ms·
This is likely at least partially driven by a desire to stop maintaining Intel versions of macOS. Apple tends to keep the list of supported hardware short anyw
by kitsunesoba 4y ago
This is likely at least partially driven by a desire to stop maintaining Intel versions of macOS.
Apple tends to keep the list of supported hardware short anyway, but there’s added incentive with the architecture change — Intel macs are missing several things that are present in M-series macs, which means that they can’t write updates assuming those features are present, which naturally complicates things. There was a bit of this with the PowerPC → Intel transition too, though I’d argue that change wasn’t nearly as dramatic, with the main difference being increased clock speeds and core counts. M-series is more significantly different from Intel (and x86 as a whole) overall than Intel/x86 was from PPC.
I suspect that the first release of macOS where Intel support is out of the picture entirely (or restricted only to 2019 Mac Pro towers with an M-series accelerator card installed) will also bring the most radical set of changes shipped in a macOS update in a long, long time since they’ll be able to make those aforementioned assumptions.
Does this justify cut back support timelines? Probably not, but it tracks with Apple’s typical mode of operation.
- lapcat 4y ago> will also bring the most radical set of changes shipped in a macOS update in a long, long time More radical than Big Sur, which iOSified the entire Mac UI? Catalina split the disk into a read-write data volume and a read-only system volume (which became cryptographically signed on Big Sur).
- kitsunesoba 4y agoMy prediction is that the changes to come will make both of those look almost surface-level in comparison. We’ll see though.
- lapcat 4y agoWell, UI changes are surface-level. ;-) But Apple isn't leaving much more room to make macOS like iOS. Except for App Store lockdown...