3 ms·
Not sure why "diversity of thought" is axiomatically a Good Thing. When extremely religious parents homeschool their children because they want to pass on those
by jakelazaroff 4y ago
Not sure why "diversity of thought" is axiomatically a Good Thing. When extremely religious parents homeschool their children because they want to pass on those values, that's bad for society. Some things are heterodox for a reason.
- potta_coffee 4y agoYou don't get to decide that religious values are good or bad.
- sofixa 4y agoAs a citizen in a country, you get to decide on allowing religious fundamentalists to indoctrinate their children. I choose hell no, keep religion out of schools and out of public life.
- potta_coffee 4y agoYou're using a lot of loaded language in your response. What is a "religious fundamentalist" to you? Also you're missing the point, because the topic of discussion is religious people educating their own kids, not religion in public schools.
- mensetmanusman 4y agoThis is an authoritarian mindset common on the left but is antithetical to liberal values. Having a desire to control how other people prefer to care for their children usually doesn’t end well historically.
- jakelazaroff 4y agoI do, actually.
- rfdave 4y agoI'm going to go out on a limb and claim that human sacrifice is bad.
- jpambrun 4y agoI do, and society does. Sex equality comes to mind.
- mensetmanusman 4y agoDiversity of thought is important for creating a robust problem-solving framework. Once a monoculture forms it becomes easy to subvert it because people tend to be vulnerable in the same way. e.g. a monoculture is easier to abuse by corrupt leaders. Increased diversity of thought may have prevented Germany from systematically becoming entirely reliant on Russia.