3 ms·
Yes, it is completely different, as explained in that comment. Glad we've sorted this out, I trust that you'll stop making this claim in the future.
by jsnell 4y ago
Yes, it is completely different, as explained in that comment. Glad we've sorted this out, I trust that you'll stop making this claim in the future.
- amedvednikov 4y agoAgree to disagree. An author saying that proves the bias and the attack angle.
- jsnell 4y agoIt doesn't. But there's a more important point: you're paraphrasing somebody you clearly have a great deal of personal animosity toward, completely changing the meaning in the process, and with no indication that this is what's happening. You've continued doing that even when it's pointed out to you. There are two options I can see: - You genuinely are not fluent enough in the language to either understand the original statement, or to write a fair paraphrase, and are not willing to believe this mistake. - You know exactly what you're doing. That is, if you gave the actual quote, nobody would for a moment take it as a proof of your conspiracy claims. Neither of the above is acting in good faith. I'd ask again whether you'll stop lying about what Xe said, but at this point the answer feels pretty obvious...
- Tozen 4y agoI disagree with you as well. Clearly the blog creator is hoping for V's death, for whatever hidden intentions that they have.
- jsnell 4y agoWe cannot know what the blog author was hoping for, we can only know what they wrote. And what they wrote is not anywhere near what amedvednikov repeatedly claims. Why are you ok with such blatant misrepresntation? If this conspiracy actually exists, isn't there some evidence that actually stands on its own rather than needing to be lied about?